A Milwaukee judge’s reckless decision to shield an illegal migrant from ICE has landed her in hot water with a grand jury indictment. On April 18, 2025, Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan allegedly helped Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, a man with a rap sheet longer than a CVS receipt, slip through the fingers of federal authorities. Actions, it seems, do have consequences.
Breitbart reported that Dugan faces charges of obstructing a U.S. agency and concealing a person, stemming from her alleged interference with ICE’s efforts to arrest Flores-Ruiz.
The grand jury’s indictment, detailed by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, accuses her of deliberately thwarting law enforcement. This isn’t a case of judicial oversight—it’s a bold move to undermine federal authority.
The incident unfolded in Wisconsin’s Eastern District, where Dugan is said to have concealed Flores-Ruiz, fully aware of his outstanding arrest warrant. Count one of the indictment doesn’t mince words: she knowingly hid him to prevent his capture. For a judge sworn to uphold the law, that’s a stunning betrayal of trust.
Count two ramps up the severity, charging Dugan with corruptly obstructing the Department of Homeland Security’s removal proceedings.
“On charges of obstruction,” FBI Director Kash Patel stated, signaling the feds aren’t playing games. Dugan’s actions didn’t just bend the law—they tried to break it.
Flores-Ruiz, the migrant at the center of this mess, isn’t exactly a model citizen. According to DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin, he “has a laundry list of violent criminal charges” like strangulation, battery, and domestic abuse. Helping someone with that track record evade justice? That’s a choice that defies reason.
The FBI didn’t hesitate to arrest Dugan for her role in the escape. The charges she faces aren’t light—up to six years in prison and a $350,000 fine, per the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. For a sitting judge, that’s a career-ender, and deservedly so.
Dugan’s defense team, now bolstered by legal heavyweight Paul Clement, claims she’ll “enter a plea” at her May 15 hearing.
Clement, a former U.S. Solicitor General under George W. Bush, brings serious firepower, but even he might struggle to spin this one. Obstructing federal law isn’t exactly a minor clerical error.
The timing of the incident—April 18, 2025—places it squarely in a period of heightened scrutiny over immigration enforcement. Dugan’s decision to intervene reeks of activist judging, prioritizing personal ideology over legal duty. It’s the kind of move that fuels distrust in the judiciary.
Let’s be clear: Flores-Ruiz wasn’t a hapless dreamer seeking a better life. His history of violent crimes, including strangulation and domestic abuse, paints a picture of someone who poses a real threat. Dugan’s choice to shield him raises serious questions about her judgment.
The grand jury’s indictment sends a message: no one, not even a judge, is above the law. By allegedly concealing Flores-Ruiz, Dugan didn’t just break protocol—she actively worked against the safety of her community. That’s not compassion; it’s complicity.
The penalties Dugan faces are steep, and rightly so. “The two charges carry a maximum penalty of six years in prison,” the Journal Sentinel reported, along with a hefty fine. If convicted, she’ll have plenty of time to reflect on the cost of her actions.
Clement’s involvement suggests Dugan is gearing up for a fierce legal battle. But no amount of high-priced lawyering can erase the fact that she allegedly helped a dangerous individual evade justice. The courtroom drama is just beginning, but the public’s verdict is already in.
Flores-Ruiz’s criminal history only amplifies the outrage. Strangulation, battery, domestic abuse—these aren’t minor infractions, yet Dugan allegedly saw fit to protect him. It’s a slap in the face to every law-abiding citizen who expects judges to prioritize public safety.