Allegations are flying that the Biden administration’s FBI attempted to snare President Donald Trump’s border czar, Tom Homan, in a sting operation that flopped spectacularly.
Just The News reported that the story, straight from White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, paints a picture of political warfare, with claims that undercover FBI agents dangled a $50,000 bribe in front of Homan, only to walk away empty-handed when he refused to bite.
According to Leavitt, speaking on Monday, this wasn’t just a misstep but a deliberate attempt by the Biden administration to tarnish one of Trump’s most steadfast allies.
She framed it as a textbook case of the Department of Justice being wielded as a political cudgel. Isn’t it curious how these stings seem to target only certain folks during heated campaign seasons?
Reports from MSNBC over the weekend stirred the pot, claiming the FBI captured footage of Homan supposedly accepting that hefty $50,000 sum while promising to grease the wheels for government contracts under Trump’s watch. But here’s the kicker—Leavitt insists no money ever changed hands. Sounds like someone’s script didn’t match the reality.
FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche stepped in to clear the air, announcing their investigation turned up zero evidence of criminal activity. The probe? Shut down faster than a progressive policy at a conservative rally.
Leavitt didn’t hold back when pressed by a reporter on whether Homan would need to return any cash. “Mr. Homan never took the $50,000 that you're referring to,” she snapped, urging the press to double-check their homework. That’s a polite way of saying, “Nice try, but no cigar.”
The White House, alongside President Trump, has thrown its full weight behind Homan, asserting he’s done nothing wrong and remains a key player in securing the nation’s borders. If loyalty were currency, Homan’s account would be overflowing.
Leavitt doubled down, calling the incident a glaring example of Biden’s team weaponizing federal agencies against Trump’s inner circle. Isn’t it telling that these tactics surface when political stakes are sky-high? It’s almost as if the playbook is written in permanent ink.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, however, isn’t buying the closure of the probe, demanding the Trump administration reopen the investigation into Homan’s conduct. While dissent is healthy, one wonders if this is genuine concern or just another round of political theater.
Meanwhile, President Trump has turned the tables, pressing Attorney General Pam Bondi to pursue charges against several prominent Democrats. It’s a bold countermove, signaling that two can play at this game of hardball.
On a related note, Leavitt clarified there are no plans to arrest mayors or governors of sanctuary jurisdictions like Illinois unless they break the law. It’s a measured stance, focusing on policy over vendetta—refreshing in today’s climate.
Stepping back, the lack of evidence against Homan, as confirmed by Patel and Blanche, raises questions about the FBI’s priorities under Biden’s watch. Were resources better spent elsewhere, or was this a calculated jab at a Trump loyalist? The optics aren’t flattering.
The White House’s unwavering support for Homan suggests a deeper rift between administrations, where trust in federal institutions hangs by a thread. When agencies are perceived as pawns in political chess, public confidence takes a hit.
Leavitt’s sharp words resonate with many who see this as more than just a failed sting—it’s a symptom of a system skewed against those challenging the progressive agenda. “You had FBI agents going undercover to try and entrap one of the president's top allies,” she said, painting a vivid picture of overreach. That’s not a conspiracy theory; it’s a concern worth chewing on.