Virginia Seeks Supreme Court Approval For Removing Non-Citizen Voters

 October 28, 2024

In an escalating legal battle, Virginia has reached out to the Supreme Court to authorize the state to exclude over 1,600 individuals from its voter rolls, alleging they are noncitizens, amid objections from the Justice Department and a previous court decision reversing the exclusions.

The Hill reported that Virginia's plea to the Supreme Court came as the state attempts to remove alleged noncitizens from voter registrations before the upcoming election. On Monday, Virginia appealed to the highest court in the United States, requesting permission to remove these individuals from the state's voter rolls.

This request was made following a contentious decision by a district court judge that reinstated the voter registrations, spurred by the Justice Department's argument.

The Justice Department challenged the claim of noncitizenship, leading to a district court judgment that reinstated the voters. The court argued that the removals, occurring close to an election, violated federal guidelines.

Fourth Circuit Rejects Virginia's Initial Appeal

The issue quickly escalated to the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which on a Sunday refused to put a hold on the lower court's decision. This denial has brought the situation to a critical point, prompting Virginia to seek emergency relief from the Supreme Court.

Virginia argues that letting the lower court’s ruling stand could cause broader harm to the integrity of the state’s electoral process.

Officials stress the need to ensure that only eligible citizens are on the rolls to maintain public confidence in the elections.

Governor Glenn Youngkin, soon after taking office, issued an executive order to establish a more stringent system for verifying the citizenship of registered voters.

This move came precisely 90 days before Election Day, a timeline that the Justice Department claims breaches the National Voter Registration Act, which prohibits systematic removals close to an election.

While the administration asserts that the identified individuals were noncitizens according to federal database checks or Department of Motor Vehicles records, complications arose. The U.S. District Judge Patricia Giles, who blocked the voter removals, noted possible errors in these identifications, highlighting the risk of disenfranchising legitimate voters.

Political Reactions and Broader Implications

Former President Trump, during a campaign event on Friday, labeled the court’s decision to restore these registrations "outrageous."

This sentiment reflects a broader Republican focus on stringent voter roll audits and similar measures, citing election integrity concerns. Judging from past research and current governmental reports, actual cases of noncitizen voting are relatively rare.

Nevertheless, this issue has been magnified in the political arena, particularly as key elections draw near.

In their ruling, the 4th Circuit panel did clarify that Virginia officials are not entirely powerless to act against potential illegal voting. They noted that the state could still cancel registrations on a one-on-one basis or prosecute noncitizens found to be voting.

The unfolding disagreement underscores a complex balance between maintaining stringent controls over the electoral roll and ensuring that every valid citizen retains the right to vote without undue hurdles.

Virginia's call for a Supreme Court decision illustrates the high stakes involved, especially in an election season where voter registration processes and eligibility are under intense scrutiny from public and political entities alike.

As the Supreme Court mulls Virginia’s request, the resolution of this matter will likely have significant implications not only for the individuals involved but for the broader framework of how voter registration errors and legal challenges are handled nationwide.

Copyright 2024 Patriot Mom Digest