FBI Director Kash Patel just unleashed a verbal haymaker on MSNBC, and it’s got the conservative world buzzing.
The Daily Caller reported that in a fiery post on the social media platform X, Patel didn’t hold back, targeting the network after a legal analyst’s commentary sparked controversy over Department of Justice policies and a high-profile indictment.
The drama kicked off on September 25, 2025, when former FBI Director James Comey was indicted for allegedly lying to Congress and obstructing a congressional investigation.
Reports later surfaced that an FBI agent was relieved of duty for failing to orchestrate a public “perp walk” for Comey, a move that would have paraded him before the cameras. It’s the kind of spectacle that often fuels media frenzy, and the agent’s dismissal has raised eyebrows.
Fast forward to October 4, 2025, and Patel took to X with a scathing critique of MSNBC, branding them in no uncertain terms for their coverage.
“MSNBC still an ass clown factory of disinformation,” he declared, pulling no punches in his assessment of the network’s reporting on the Comey situation. It’s a bold statement, but one that resonates with those frustrated by perceived media bias.
Patel’s ire was sparked by a post from Barb McQuade, a former U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan, who reminded everyone that DOJ policy frowns upon perp walks in front of the press.
While McQuade’s point may have legal grounding, Patel seems to see it as just another example of selective outrage from the left-leaning media. After all, rules are rules—until they’re inconvenient.
Adding fuel to the fire, Patel didn’t shy away from pointing out what he sees as MSNBC’s hypocrisy. He accused the network of previously cheering on or amplifying perp walks when it suited their narrative, specifically naming conservative figures like Roger Stone, Peter Navarro, and Steve Bannon. It’s a biting critique, suggesting a double standard that many on the right have long grumbled about.
Political consultant Roger Stone and journalist Steve Baker didn’t miss a beat, jumping into the fray by replying to Patel’s post with images of their own arrests, which were widely shared in the public eye.
Their contributions seem to bolster Patel’s argument that public shaming via perp walks has been weaponized against conservatives. It’s a visual reminder of the stakes in this debate.
Meanwhile, Patel made it crystal clear that he’s not denying the reports about the agent’s termination over the Comey perp walk fiasco. He doubled down, emphasizing that under his watch, the FBI operates on strict adherence to orders. If you don’t follow the chain of command, you’re out the door—simple as that.
Patel’s stance on discipline within the FBI is unapologetic, and for many conservatives, it’s a refreshing change of pace. There’s a sense among supporters that the agency has long needed a firm hand to steer it away from political gamesmanship. Whether this hardline approach will restore trust or deepen divisions remains to be seen.
On the flip side, MSNBC has stayed mum, offering no immediate response to inquiries from the Daily Caller News Foundation about Patel’s accusations. Their silence could be strategic, or it might just signal they’ve got no counterpunch ready. Either way, it leaves the field open for Patel’s narrative to dominate the conversation.
For those of us who value accountability over optics, Patel’s frustration with media spin is understandable, even if his colorful language raises a few eyebrows.
The idea of perp walks as a tool for public humiliation rather than justice is a thorny issue, and it’s worth asking why some cases get the spotlight while others don’t. It’s a question the progressive media might not be eager to answer.
Comey’s indictment itself is a bombshell, a stark reminder that no one is above scrutiny, even former heads of powerful agencies. For conservatives, it’s a long-overdue reckoning for what they see as years of institutional bias within the FBI. The perp walk debate only adds a layer of intrigue to an already explosive story.
The broader implications of this clash go beyond just one network or one case—it’s about how justice is portrayed and perceived in the public square.
Patel’s insistence on chain-of-command loyalty within the FBI signals a no-nonsense approach that many on the right applaud, especially after years of feeling targeted by selective enforcement. It’s a pushback against what some call a weaponized justice system.
Yet, there’s a flip side worth considering: perp walks, while often sensationalized, can also serve as a public signal that accountability is being pursued. The tension between policy and perception is real, and even conservatives might debate whether such displays are necessary or just theatrical. Still, Patel’s point about media inconsistency stings with a ring of truth.