The House committees have referred Hunter Biden and James Biden for criminal prosecution, highlighting alleged false testimonies linked to Joe Biden's influence in family business dealings.
Breitbart reported that House committees have recently escalated their investigation into Hunter Biden and James Biden, pushing for criminal referrals to the Justice Department. This comes after allegations surfaced that both made false statements during congressional hearings about the extent of President Joe Biden's involvement in their business activities.
Investigations began with accusations that President Biden benefitted financially from the influence-peddling activities orchestrated by his son Hunter and brother James.
The Oversight Committee, led by Chair James Comer, initially explored payments Joe Biden allegedly received from his family members tied to their foreign business engagements.
The focus soon shifted towards discrepancies in Hunter Biden's testimonies. He was accused of falsely denying being the corporate secretary for Rosemont Seneca Bohai, despite documents confirming his role as 'acting Secretary.' These documents starkly contradicted Hunter's congressional statements, raising serious questions about the integrity of his testimonies.
Adding to the complications, the Oversight Committee disclosed in May that, based on information from an IRS whistleblower, Hunter Biden was the beneficial owner of a bank account associated with Rosemont Seneca Bohai (RSB). This detail was crucial as it tied Hunter directly to the financial conduits used in the family's business operations.
Moreover, Hunter's communications with individuals linked to CEFC China Energy Co. further contradicted his earlier statements to Congress. Despite his assertion that he had no communications with a 'Zhao' associated with the Chinese company, evidence suggested a different scenario.
James Biden, Joe Biden's brother, also came under scrutiny when he denied any involvement of Joe Biden in the family business—an assertion starkly refuted by Tony Bobulinski, a former business associate. Bobulinski's explosive testimony before Congress reported that Joe Biden was involved in their foreign business affairs, directly contacting and discussing ventures with other family members.
This claim was unwound further when Bobulinski pointed out that Hunter Biden had confirmed an incident where James had lied about a meeting, which according to him constituted perjury before the congressional committee. In response, the committee repeated queries to James Biden, only to receive the same misleading responses.
As committee chairs like Jim Jordan and Jason Smith drove the investigations forward, they expressed deep concerns over what seemed like a calculated effort to protect Joe Biden during his impeachment inquiry. This suggested to them that misleading testimonies were not mere oversights but part of a broader strategy. chauffeur>
The implications of these allegations are profound, touching on the legal and ethical responsibilities of public figures to provide truthful information to legislative bodies. Chairman Smith explicitly noted that lying during sworn testimony is a serious felony offense, which has seen numerous prosecutions in recent years.
The Oversight Chair, Comer, also emphasized the importance of accountability, asserting that if ordinary citizens are held to these standards, so should the President's son, hinting at a perceived disparity in how justice is dispensed.
The criminal referrals issued by the House committees represent a significant escalation in the ongoing saga surrounding the Biden family's business dealings and their potential political ramifications. They point to a broader narrative about transparency and accountability in political office, positioning the spotlight firmly on the Department of Justice to take the appropriate actions based on the referrals.
To conclude, the criminal referrals concern alleged perjury by Hunter and James Biden regarding their denial of Joe Biden’s involvement in their business affairs and other discrepancies in their testimonies related to foreign business dealings.
These referrals highlight serious questions about the veracity of statements made to protect high-ranking officials and the integrity expected in such positions of responsibility. The ongoing investigations and subsequent actions by the Justice Department will be pivotal in addressing these significant legal and ethical concerns.