California Gov. Gavin Newsom just tossed a verbal grenade at White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, and it’s landed with a thud heard ‘round the political sphere.
In a startling social media post from his official press office account, Newsom referred to Miller as “SS,” a term loaded with historical baggage tied to the Nazi regime’s brutal Schutzstaffel, responsible for horrific atrocities during the Holocaust.
Breitbart reported that the post, blasted out on X by the “GovPressOffice” account, was written in all-caps, leaving no room for misinterpretation of its pointed jab at Miller, who is Jewish.
This isn’t just a casual slip; calling a Jewish individual by a term associated with Nazi perpetrators is widely seen as a form of Holocaust denial, a deeply offensive act that flips the script on victims and oppressors.
The “GovPressOffice” account, meant for serious state business, often veers into trolling territory, especially when it comes to needling President Donald Trump, but this latest stunt crosses a line into dangerous rhetoric.
Attempts to get clarity from Newsom’s office on this inflammatory post have been met with radio silence, leaving observers to wonder if this was a calculated move or a reckless misstep.
Let’s unpack the gravity here: using “SS” to describe a Jewish public figure isn’t just poor taste—it’s a deliberate poke at historical wounds that still haven’t healed for many.
Newsom’s pattern of fiery language against Republicans isn’t new, but this particular shot at Miller feels personal, and it’s hard to see it as anything but a cheap grab for attention.
While some might argue it’s just political banter, the context of Miller’s heritage makes this a far cry from harmless sparring—it’s a low blow that demands accountability.
This incident comes on the heels of other violent events, like the assassination of Charlie Kirk and a shooting at an Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility, though details on timing remain unclear in public reports.
Yet, Newsom seems undeterred, doubling down on incendiary rhetoric against his political opponents, even as the national mood grows increasingly tense.
Is this really the leadership we need when words can so easily fuel division, or worse, inspire more unrest in an already polarized climate?
Some suggest Newsom’s antics are less about principle and more about positioning himself as the loudest anti-Trump voice in the room, eyeing a future Democratic presidential nomination in 2028.
His claim that Trump will somehow be on the ballot in 2028, despite clear evidence to the contrary, only adds fuel to the speculation that this is all a performance for media spotlight and party clout.
While robust debate is the lifeblood of democracy, using historically charged insults to score points isn’t just distasteful—it’s a disservice to the serious issues facing California and the nation, and it’s time for cooler heads to prevail.