Bill Maher Claims Iran Supporting Kamala Harris, Rogue State Does Not Want Trump In Office

 September 7, 2024

In a recent episode of HBO's "Real Time," Bill Maher delved into the complexities of U.S. foreign policy towards Iran, claiming that they want Vice President Kamala Harris in charge.

Breitbart reported that Maher recently ignited discussions on "Real Time," addressing the oscillating dynamics of U.S. foreign relations with Iran. Maher retrospectively examined the efforts under President Obama to nurture relations with Iran and integrate it back into the international community—a process he argues was thwarted by subsequent actions from the Trump administration.

Maher expressed dissatisfaction with the political reversal that followed Obama's era, specifically accusing former President Trump of dismantling prior diplomatic advancements with Iran.

This bold claim sets the stage for a deeper analysis of the operational continuity between different U.S. administrations.

Emerging Criticism From Former National Security Adviser

In juxtaposition, H.R. McMaster, a former Trump National Security Adviser, offered a critical view of the Obama, Biden, and Harris administration's policies.

He rebuked their strategic positions on the Middle East, particularly their efforts to welcome Iran back into global diplomatic circles while maintaining support for Israel. This critique highlights a significant contention point in U.S. foreign policy circles.

Maher defended the Obama administration's approach, asserting that its failure was primarily due to Trump's decision to retract these policies. He held firm that the efforts under Obama were never fully exercised due to premature withdrawal under his successor, concluding that "That only failed because Trump undid it, we never really tried it."

This restoration of policy under the Biden administration, attempting to revert to Obama-era dynamics with Iran, further complicates the geopolitical narrative, according to Maher.

Within his critique, Maher outlined the primary foes of the United States: China, Russia, North Korea, and Iran.

He proposed that among these, Russia and Iran potentially could be reintegrated into the international arena if diplomatic efforts are channeled appropriately, given the presumption that their populations do not support their current political standings.

Contrasting sharply, Maher depicted North Korea and China as far more rigid antagonists due to their domestic policies and governance structures—with North Korea described as "a basket case of brainwashed people" and China as a stringent "surveillance state."

This distinction is crucial in understanding Maher's perspective on global diplomatic strategies and the varying degrees of reintegration feasibility among these nations.

The Continuing Issue of Election Interference

Transitioning the conversation, Maher also touched on the recurrent issue of election interference from foreign adversaries such as Russia, China, and Iran.

He recalled the evolution of this interference since 2016, framing it as a significant escalation in international cyber activism against U.S. electoral integrity.

He humorously noted the perceived preferences of Russia and Iran for U.S. presidential candidates in previous elections, suggesting a surreal balancing act of foreign influences on American politics—specifically remarking, "It’s funny, Iran is for Kamala, and Russia is for [Trump]. So, maybe they just cancel each other out."

The discussion of election interference underscores a broader concern about the durability of these international conflicts and the challenge of addressing them in the realm of U.S. domestic policy.

Further complicating the discussion, Maher mentioned the sanctions relief that Iran received under the Iran nuclear deal, which reportedly empowered the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). This aspect of international aid demonstrates the unintended consequences that can arise from diplomatic engagements.

These comments from the episode of "Real Time" contribute to a broader understanding of Maher's views on international politics, diplomatic strategy, and the complexities involved in reconciling historical grievances with future aspirations.

Copyright 2024 Patriot Mom Digest