Rep. Brandon Gill (R-TX) just dropped a bombshell on national television that could shake up the ongoing probe into former President Joe Biden’s mental fitness.
On Friday’s broadcast of Fox Business Network’s “Mornings with Maria,” Gill, a member of the House Oversight Committee, floated the idea of subpoenaing former Vice President Kamala Harris as part of an investigation into Biden’s cognitive decline while in office, alongside other concerning issues like the autopen scandal.
This jaw-dropping suggestion didn’t come out of nowhere. Breitbart reported that the House Oversight Committee has been digging deep into questions about Biden’s mental state during his tenure, and Gill isn’t the only one pointing fingers at Harris for answers.
Just a day before Gill’s television appearance, the committee interviewed former Biden White House spokesman Ian Sams.
Oversight Chair James Comer revealed a stunning tidbit: Sams admitted to seeing Biden only twice in over two years of service. Now, if that doesn’t raise eyebrows about who was really in the loop, what will?
Comer didn’t stop there—he hinted that Harris’s testimony could be a key piece of the puzzle. Her insight, he suggested, might help untangle the mysterious autopen portion of the investigation. It’s a polite way of saying, “We’ve got questions, and she might have answers.”
Gill, for his part, didn’t mince words when asked about a potential subpoena. “I would like to see Kamala Harris subpoenaed,” he stated firmly. He believes she was closer to Biden than most and ought to explain what she knew about his condition.
Adding fuel to the fire, new documents obtained by the oversight project from the Department of Justice paint a troubling picture.
These records show that even folks inside the Biden White House were raising red flags about the former president’s state. It’s not just outsiders speculating—insiders were worried too.
One name popping up in these documents is former Assistant Deputy Attorney General Bradley Weinsheimer. He reportedly expressed concerns about Biden’s term and the slew of pardons issued for federal convicts. If that’s not a signal of deeper issues, it’s hard to say what is.
Host Cheryl Casone pressed Gill on the air, asking point-blank, “Are you going to subpoena Kamala Harris?” It’s the question on everyone’s mind, and Gill’s response was a clear signal of intent. He didn’t back down, doubling down on the need for accountability.
Gill’s broader commentary on the situation was just as sharp. “Listen, these are the people who portrayed themselves as being in the know,” he said, pointing out that while Americans could see Biden struggling on TV, those around him claimed everything was fine. It’s a classic case of “trust us, not your lying eyes,” and Gill isn’t buying it.
He went further, calling this a “huge scandal” that implicates not just the Biden administration but also what he sees as a complicit progressive media.
The failure to question the official narrative, in his view, is a disservice to the public. It’s a fair critique when transparency seems to have taken a backseat.
The autopen investigation, a lesser-known but critical part of this probe, keeps coming up as a sticking point. Comer believes Harris could shed light on how signatures were handled during Biden’s tenure, a detail that might seem small but could speak volumes about who was truly calling the shots.
Let’s be real: the American people watched Biden’s debates, saw the glazed looks during press interactions, and wondered what was really going on.
Gill’s frustration echoes a broader sentiment that the public was kept in the dark by an administration more focused on optics than honesty. It’s not about personal attacks—it’s about getting to the truth.
Subpoenaing Harris might sound like a drastic step, but if she were as close to Biden as her role suggests, her perspective could be invaluable. The committee’s work isn’t about political theater; it’s about ensuring that those in power aren’t hiding critical information from the people they serve. That’s a principle worth standing behind.