Senator Chris Van Hollen, a Maryland Democrat, appeared on ABC’s “This Week” to discuss his trip to El Salvador, where he advocated for the legal rights of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, an illegal immigrant deported to El Salvador.
Breitbart reported that Van Hollen claimed that his mission was to uphold the rule of law, not to defend Abrego Garcia’s actions. The Trump administration admitted in court that Abrego Garcia was wrongfully detained and deported.
Abrego Garcia’s case is complex, marked by allegations and legal battles. In 2021, his wife obtained an order of protection against him, citing claims of abuse and detention.
Despite these accusations, Van Hollen insists that due process must apply to all individuals, regardless of their past.
The Trump administration disagrees, citing Garcia's documented criminal history and status as an illegal immigrant and member of an organization designated as a terrorist group.
During his television appearance, Van Hollen clarified his position with strong words. “I am not defending the man,” he stated, emphasizing that his focus is on protecting Abrego Garcia’s legal rights. He believes that failing to uphold these rights risks undermining justice for everyone.
The senator’s trip to El Salvador was driven by his commitment to ensuring fair treatment. He argued that the Trump administration’s handling of the case was flawed, pointing to their court admission of wrongful actions. This has raised questions about the administration’s approach to immigration enforcement.
Abrego Garcia’s wife has also entered the fray, advocating for his return to the United States. She insists that his rights must be respected, aligning with Van Hollen’s call for due process. Her involvement adds a personal dimension to the legal and political controversy.
District Court Judge Xinis played a pivotal role in the case, issuing a significant ruling. She found no evidence linking Abrego Garcia to MS-13 or any terrorist activity, a point Van Hollen highlighted on “This Week.” This judicial decision has bolstered the senator’s argument for a fair legal process.
Van Hollen quoted Judge Xinis to underscore the lack of evidence against Abrego Garcia. “They put no evidence linking Abrego Garcia to MS-13,” he said, citing her ruling.
The senator accused the administration of deflecting attention from their legal missteps. He claimed they focused on Abrego Garcia’s record rather than presenting solid evidence in court. This tactic, Van Hollen argued, undermines the integrity of the judicial system.
Of course, these statements ignore the very real evidence tying Garcia to MS-13, including the tattoos on his body that demonstrate his affiliation with the notorious and brutally violent gang.
Van Hollen’s defense of due process resonates with conservative values that prioritize legal fairness.
He warned that stripping rights from one individual could set a dangerous precedent. “We jeopardize it for everybody else,” he said, stressing the broader implications of the case.
The Trump administration’s admission of wrongful detention has intensified the controversy. Van Hollen urged them to provide evidence or cease their claims, stating, “They should put up or shut up in court.” His blunt language reflects frustration with what he sees as political posturing.
Abrego Garcia’s case highlights tensions between immigration policy and legal protections. Van Hollen’s advocacy underscores the importance of maintaining a system that respects individual rights. His stance, while controversial, aligns with the principle that justice must be blind.