The UK Supreme Court’s latest ruling has ignited a firestorm among reality TV stars, who see it as a blow to progressive ideals. On April 16, 2025, the court declared that “woman” and “sex” in equality laws mean biological sex, not gender identity. This decision, while affirming protections for trans people, has drawn sharp criticism from figures tied to RuPaul’s Drag Race UK.
Breitbart reported that the ruling clarifies that legal definitions prioritize biology over self-identified gender in matters of equality. Justices emphasized that transgender individuals remain safeguarded against discrimination under UK law.
Stars of the popular drag show took to social media to voice their dismay. Divina De Campo, a standout from Drag Race UK Season 1, posted on X, signaling a defiant stance against the ruling.
Her words reflect a broader sentiment among performers who fear the decision undermines trans rights.
De Campo’s post on April 16 was blunt: “The fight back starts today.” She vowed that trans advocates would not retreat, urging resistance against what she sees as an unjust ruling. Her fiery rhetoric underscores the emotional weight of the court’s decision for many in the trans community.
Tayce, a finalist from Season 2, was equally scathing, calling the Supreme Court a “piece of shit” on Instagram Stories.
She expressed solidarity with trans individuals, insisting that no ruling could erase their existence. Her comments, reported by PinkNews, highlight the visceral anger among drag performers.
Bimini, another Season 2 runner-up, amplified a statement from Not A Phase, a UK-based trans advocacy group. The organization argued that the ruling marginalizes trans people and claimed no trans voices were consulted in the decision. Bimini’s post on Instagram aimed to rally support for the trans community.
Not A Phase’s statement, shared by Bimini, asserted that denying trans women’s oppression under patriarchy dismisses broader struggles for equality.
It declared, “Our existence can never be taken away.” The group warned that the ruling’s implications remain unclear but could deepen trans marginalization.
Cara Melle, a trans star from Drag Race UK Season 5, took to Instagram Stories to address the ruling. She noted that targeting trans women feels like a step backward, yet affirmed the resilience of the trans community. Melle’s words reflect a mix of frustration and determination.
Ella Morgan, a trans star from Lifetime’s Married at First Sight, appeared on Good Morning Britain to discuss the ruling. She expressed fear that the decision would legally define her as a man, stating, “I’m nervous and scared.” Morgan’s comments reveal the personal toll of the court’s stance.
Morgan further emphasized her identity, saying, “I still see myself as a woman.” She vowed to continue using female restrooms, defying any legal redefinition. Her resolve highlights the tension between personal identity and judicial rulings.
Tia Kofi, winner of RuPaul’s Drag Race: UK vs. the World, called for broader allyship in a series of Instagram Stories. She argued that trans people alone cannot be expected to fight for their rights. Kofi’s plea underscores the need for collective action in the face of perceived injustice.
Kofi also warned of historical parallels, suggesting that targeting trans people could lead to broader attacks on minority rights. “There is literal historical precedent,” she said, pointing to patterns of marginalization. Her comments frame the ruling as a potential precursor to further erosion of freedoms.
The Supreme Court’s decision has stirred a cultural debate, with drag stars at the forefront. Their platforms amplify voices that might otherwise be drowned out, yet the ruling stands firm. It reaffirms biological definitions while maintaining legal protections for trans individuals.
Critics like Kofi fear the ruling sets a dangerous precedent, despite assurances from the court. The justices’ clarification that trans people are protected has done little to quell outrage. For many, the focus on biological sex feels like a rejection of "progress."
However, for many regular people, the ruling is an affirmation of longstanding biological truths that are not subject to the whim of progressive trends.