President Donald Trump’s bold move to end birthright citizenship for children of illegal aliens now faces a historic Supreme Court challenge.
Breitbart reported that in January, Trump signed an executive order targeting the so-called “anchor baby” policy, sparking immediate legal battles. The nation awaits a landmark ruling that could reshape immigration policy.
The Supreme Court will hear arguments on May 15 regarding Trump’s controversial executive order. This policy seeks to stop granting automatic citizenship to roughly 250,000 children born annually in the U.S. to illegal alien parents. The court’s decision could clarify a long-debated constitutional question.
Pro-mass migration groups, including CASA Inc. and the Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project, filed lawsuits to block the order right after its signing.
They argue that the policy unfairly targets vulnerable families and violates constitutional protections. The case has drawn intense scrutiny from both sides of the immigration debate.
Trump’s executive order, signed in January, aims to end what conservatives call the “anchor baby” loophole. This policy allows U.S.-born children of illegal aliens to gain citizenship despite their parents’ lack of legal ties to the country. Critics say it incentivizes illegal immigration.
The term “anchor baby” refers to children who, upon reaching adulthood, can sponsor their illegal alien parents and foreign relatives for green cards. This process can secure permanent residency for entire families, often spanning generations. Conservatives argue this undermines fair immigration enforcement.
The Supreme Court has never directly ruled on whether the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause mandates birthright citizenship for children of illegal aliens.
Many legal scholars question the assumption that such children are automatically entitled to citizenship. The upcoming case could settle this dispute.
The 14th Amendment states that citizenship applies to those “subject to the jurisdiction” of the U.S. Conservative scholars argue that illegal aliens, by their unlawful presence, do not fully meet this criterion. They believe the amendment’s original intent excludes children of illegal aliens from automatic citizenship.
Border czar Tom Homan has weighed in on the issue, expressing skepticism about automatic citizenship. “I think the Supreme Court finally needs to answer that question,” Homan said. He emphasized that the legal clarity of the 14th Amendment is not as straightforward as some claim.
Homan further noted his perspective as a non-lawyer. “I’m not a lawyer, but I can read,” he said. He argued that the assumption of automatic citizenship for children of illegal aliens lacks a clear constitutional basis.
The Supreme Court’s notice on Thursday confirmed that oral arguments are set for May 15. This timeline underscores the urgency of resolving the contentious issue. The ruling could have far-reaching effects on U.S. immigration policy.
If the court upholds Trump’s executive order, it could significantly reduce the number of “anchor babies” born each year. This would limit the ability of illegal aliens to secure legal status through their U.S.-born children. Supporters of the order see it as a critical step toward stronger border security.
Opponents, however, warn that ending birthright citizenship could destabilize families and communities. They argue that the policy unfairly punishes children for their parents’ actions. The emotional weight of the debate has fueled passionate arguments on both sides.
As May 15 approaches, the nation braces for a decision that could redefine citizenship laws. The outcome will likely influence future immigration reforms and border policies. Both supporters and critics await the court’s verdict with bated breath.